Notifications new functionalities request

pash wrote:

Anyone knows that informing human resources about their probably mistakes/violations helps organizations to manage them better (what I asked as first idea). If you talk to company managers (or better to HR managers) they tell you the best practice is to inform human resources about their mistakes and violations first and find that violations they have done is purposely or not. In such a scenario good human resources will be guided to self control. Many years ago human resources were considered as slaves whom should be under control of organizations but modern concepts in HR saying that any organization is under control of their human resources and they need to involve and consider their employees in their decisions, goals settings and strategies. So, I believe that notifications should be sent to Driver first and if he/she didn't make changes in his/her behavior other notification should be sent to the supervisor (What I asked as second idea).
Combination of such new functionalities in notifications will help us (and our clients) to manage better.
I want to remind our community that FMS stands for Fleet Management System!

We also need notification in base of XXX activations on a sensor.
thanks

Dear hhamedk, not yet.
I set higher priority to your request to choose "send SMS to driver or triggered unit". We recently got the same request from one more partner.

The second part of the request is more complicated and unclear. I'm not sure that this case is typical enough and what parameters are most important: to send a notification after several triggers or to send in particular conditions or both or there is some more cases. But for now, we have not enough resources for research it and develop. That is why it will stay in the backlog for now.

The scheme was clear. But it is a theory. Still stays unclear the situations from life when such behavior is required or needed.
I imagine an example. I control the entrance in a geofence. The vehicle comes into the zone. First 5 messages I should get alerts in a popup window. 6th alert I expect by SMS. Depend on device's settings this may take from 10 sec to 5 minutes. What a business problem I may have to use this way of informing? If I want to know that vehicle visit a geofence, I need a single alert by any channel. If I want to know, that vehicle stays in a zone for 5 minutes, I use notification setting "min alarm state".  What a problem I may solve by sending 5 notification to the interface and 6th by SMS, I don't know. I focus attention that behavior of such function depends strongly from device setting.

I do not recommend to use a number of triggers as a parameter. It depends on device settings too much. One driver may have 3 messages in a minute, another the same 3 messages may send in 5 minutes. But the time of a real violation will differ in 5 times.
I would try to solve with a couple of notification with one type. E.g.:
1st. Notification on speeding that will send SMS/notification to a driver on every message
2nd. Notification on speeding with min alarm duration 1 minute that will send a notification to a manager
3rd. Notification on speeding with min alarm duration 3 minutes that will register a violation.

Yes, this looks like duplications, but servers won't suffer much from such construction.
But it is easy to set and control. The scheme with various terms and actions cannot be easy. Notifications setting are not simple now, and we do not want to make them more complex.

tata, any idea about last question?

tata, don't you have any timeline still?

tata, would you please update us in this regards?

mars, thank you for your feedback.
If I understood correctly, you mean there should be more partner/user interested in such feature to be implemented. Right?